Author page pulls in items based on Creator, it should be Owner

[and]

So that a Member can add an item on behalf of another Member, and then assign Ownership to that Member, and have that item listed in that other Member's author page.

[dave]

The video states that the author (Creator) of the okvideo is the user in question :

 http://www.engagemedia.org/Members/okvideo/videos/montir.avi/view

[anna]

Hmm I think the point it it is being listed in "alimander"'s author page, not "okvideo"'s... so the folder should list items by creator, not by owner. Will check this with him.

[anna]

 http://testing.plumi.org:16080/Plone/author/test

i just tested adding a video as "manager" and changing owner to "test". this now appears in "test" author page.

but - just need to change the part that says "Posted: Jan 24, 2011 by manager" below each video.

this should reflect owner rather than creator also.

as this has its own view - is it possible to update this (or check it) on the generic video listing view also?

[dave]

It already shows 'test' not manager ... ?

[anna]

i just tested again to be sure.

i changed the owner of this video from "test" to "reviewer"  http://testing.plumi.org:16080/Plone/Members/test/videos/test-video/

in that page it says "by Reviewer — last modified Jan 26, 2011 02:37 AM" which is what it's meant to do.

however, now in the reviewer's author page it lists two videos from user "test", including the one i just changed ownership of, but it says "Posted: Dec 22, 2010 by test" for that video (not "by reviewer")

 http://testing.plumi.org:16080/Plone/author/reviewer

so why is it listing one of "test"'s videos, and one of "reviewer"'s videos too - but saying it belongs to "test"?

[dave]

As per skype discussions with Anna, Owner is a role that can have multiple people with it hence we were having difficulty with the code, coupled with the fact it is not in the portal_catalog this could be an expensive call on a large site.

Not quite sure of an easy way ahead with this.

[anna]

making this critical - though it may not be solvable, much investigation has already been done, we should finish this one way or another - by finding a solution or ditching the requirement.

[and]

Dave, you found a work around for this no with just calling things from the video folder? Do you want to take this ticket back?

[and]

It works, nice stuff. Will need to double check this when we have more data but for the moment looks pretty good.